Opened 5 years ago

Closed 4 years ago

Last modified 4 years ago

#2375 closed design-issue (worksforme)

Does Revenue cycle change how we tag diagnoses as clinical vs. billing

Reported by: rwaitman Owned by: badagarla
Priority: major Milestone: heron-toronto-update
Component: data-repository Keywords: public-web
Cc: tmcmahon, dconnolly, rwaitman Blocked By:
Blocking: Sensitive: no

Description

With implementation of Revenue cycle, billing is being done in O2. Does that mean we are now receiving some billing diagnoses data, whereas before Revenue Cycle it was all clinical diagnoses?

Purpose of the ticket is to understand if:

  • diagnoses from O2 now also include billing data
  • there is some way to separate clinical diagnoses vs. billing diagnoses from O2.

Change History (6)

comment:1 Changed 5 years ago by dconnolly

  • Type changed from task to design-issue

comment:2 Changed 4 years ago by badagarla

Dr. Waitman : This seems to be a project that Kelly Gerard is working on. Should I assign this ticket to her and move the deadline down the road? Or should I keep it on my list?

comment:3 Changed 4 years ago by rwaitman

  • Resolution set to wontfix
  • Status changed from new to closed

After talking with Theresa Jackson and reviewing the materials from Epic, I think we've learned that the coders diagnoses go into different tables, they don't go into the problem list or pat_enc_dx.

comment:4 Changed 4 years ago by rwaitman

  • Resolution wontfix deleted
  • Status changed from closed to reopened

comment:5 Changed 4 years ago by rwaitman

  • Resolution set to worksforme
  • Status changed from reopened to closed

comment:6 Changed 4 years ago by ngraham

  • Keywords public-web added
  • Sensitive unset
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.